To be fair, I’ve only been “online” since the end of last year, when, through a convoluted and mostly-forgotten process, I found an obscure forum for South African affiliate marketers, and through that, a site called “Affiliate Lounge” (run by Philip van Coller, since retired to blogging at dreampunchboy.com).
It was in that site’s blogroll that I found imod.co.za. And from that, the rest of the local web. So Chris M, I lay all blame for this squarely on your shoulders :)
Essentially, we’re this incredibly closed, myopic community. Having been introduced to this whole shebang via Entrecard, and having seen the synergies between American (North and South), English, African and far-east (Australian and Pinoy) bloggers, I’ve come to realise just what a tiny speck the SA community actually is.
And it’s even smaller than the local Internet community. I’ve delved into local IRC servers, forums like mybroadband, and I’ve tried to put everything into perspective. I’ve also spent a lot of time on Blat and iBlog, getting my fair dose of the 12000-odd blogs (most of whom are duplicates, 3-post 6-month old personal diaries, affiliate marketing sites, or so poorly written/maintained that it makes no difference).
I’ve guessing that there are primarily three “layers” to our South African internet community.
1. Those that spend most of their time on forums/chatrooms (same type of people try starting free blogs, but with a 80% fail rate)
2. Those that have well-maintained Facebook (or other single social site) profiles (they rarely collide with (1))
3. Those that have blogs, Facebook, Twitter, and generally live on the social media forefront (that’d be us).
Now, obviously, numbers are never perfect, people can straddle fences, and so on and so forth. But to give you an idea - WorldWideWorx estimates internet penetration at the end of 2007 to be around 8%.
I’m also going to make an assumption that social media is social, and that by it’s very nature, you’ll eventually end up discovering macrospheres. For instance, one of us signs up a friend to Twitter, and all they need to do is follow the people you’re following, and they’re essentially connected to the rest of the local Twitterverse.
Geolocation scans for twitter users estimates there to be about ~600 users in SA, but I’ve checked those profiles manually, and most of them are very dead, with last updates being 3 months to 1 year ago. Given the stats at TwitterSA, there are an estimated 160 very active Twitter users.
Those 160 people, just based on what I’ve seen day-to-day, are mostly involved in new media and marketing, or are otherwise capable of spending enough time online to form part of (or consider themselves part of) the “social media crowd”.
So, then. By now, there should be around 4 million internet users in SA. A search on Facebook reveals there are ~715′500 users in the “South Africa” network. And there are ~160 with active New Social Media profiles.

Yet, for our obvious lack of reach/influence in the local Internet community, some of us can be so loudmouthed, arrogant, pompous and elitist, that we completely lose perspective of the notion of how tiny that bubble really is.
And I’m not the only one who realises this - not the only one getting sick of certain peoples holier-than-thou approach to the whole thing, as if they’re the priests presiding over this massively influential movement in the SA webspace.
Because quite frankly, Social Media is misunderstood in SA. And our polluted little corner of it is no different. If it suddenly vanished, I don’t think anyone’ll even feel the bump.
But oh, you might say, there are so many Companies jumping into this space to share in the whatever and so forth. Yes there are. You know why? Because our little 160-man camp plays host to a bunch of people that A. know what the Internet is, and B. know how to use it.
People. There’s your keyword. That’s the whole reason why this whole thing exists in the first place. Human connection, clear communication, bridging the divide, sharing the knowledge, educating those around you to reach above you, contributing selflessly into building a greater whole that thousands (if not millions) will benefit from.
Which is why this elitism has to go. It just has to bloody go. There are no excuses, just the plain and simple truth that we are poisoning our very own “open garden” before the rest of South Africa has even got their brochures.
I’m just posting this as a reminder to all of us - not to get caught up in our own importance. Social Media is bigger than that, and if we’re gonna have a hope in hell of reaching out to the rest of SA’s internet (to really make a difference), we’d better get our shit sorted, and fast.
Because at this point, and given the way things are going, we’re heading for nothing but a divide. Those that enjoy being worshipped vs those that are out to make a difference vs those that just want to have a good time. And with a camp of 160 people? A popping zit makes more noise.
So please, people. Take those cardboard robes off, roll up your sleeves, and really get in there. There’s still so much to accomplish - we haven’t scratched the tip of the iceberg yet.





[...] the full entry here: http://woganmay.com/2008/10/the-truth-about-social-media-part-2/ Tags: elitism, percentages, Social Media, South Africa, [...]
I agree with the sentiment, just not the rest.
There is a LOT of social interaction that takes place out of the “public” eye. I would guess that most people newly arrived online, prefer not to assume that everyone else is interested in their every move. Who gives a toss when someone “Goes to work’ “Takes a Shit” etc etc which seems to be the extent of the majority of the Twitter posts..
Actually, Twitter’s mostly about airports and what we had for lunch ;)
But despite that, it’s a very personal medium, and it drives community engagement to the highest possible levels - that’s exactly what Social Media is about. It’s not really about the Media as much as it is about the Social :)
And on that note… I’m going to have my leftover’s from last night for lunch.
:) Great points. Once again it’s a pity how little penetration much of the net has in SA.
Ah dude, but you know you love it! :P
P.S. In your movement from offline to online, did you never read about what backlinking is? muhahaha ;)
@Chris love what? lol.
Oh, snap, the links. They were all there, but then I had to take the post through Notepad, and they vanished… I’ll put ‘em back momentarily.
geez Chris, militant about back-linking much?
I agree with you, Wogan, and with sentiments you’ve raised elswhere - people aren’t getting the meaning of ’social’ media. forgetting that ’social’ means a group and more than the INDIVIDUAL - therefore elitism is exclusionary, and not the point of social media in the first place.
In my opinion of course. As some have shown, it’s better to ignore my opinion, because what does the opinion of a big-boobed blonde lady who blogs about sex and relationships and real life actually know?
hahah.
Hhahahahahhahaha!
Hey Wogan, I have been thinking about this post of yours a lot for a number of reasons. One of them is that, as you know, I sell books etc online so it is important to me to leverage viral marketing as much as I can. Another reason is that I often act as the middle-man in connecting various people who are interested in a common subject. The reason that I am successful at the second is because I am very well connected online. I had a reason to get some figures together for a proposal the other day, and it worked out like this… if I put out a message to the community of people who are interested in the particular topic that is my focus/passion, I know that I would reach no less than 40 thousand people in the first layer of contacts, and at least triple that in the second and third layers. Do i use twitter to do this? No way. I cannot find more than three people that I even suspect I am connected to who are on twitter. Rather, I would post to 7 email lists and around 100 odd facebook groups, on 12 topic specific web-forums and another three thousand or so personal email contacts.
The point I would like to emphasise, is that the real social networking happens in a space that has nothing to do with the web at all really, because it happens via email. Either through email lists or from personal email forwarding. I know that is not “sexy” or “Web 2.0″ enough, but it is the reality, not just of SA but of a lot of other places too.
Please remember that your definition of “South African” in the ‘net space is waaay too limited. I know of LOTS of people for example who are South African, living in SA but their network is not SA, but rather their University or company etc.. and never mind those who are out of the country. There are also lots of people who are constantly online, but use the web primarily for browsing, and email for social interaction!
JD
Absolutely. Email is huge. Email is 90% of the entire connection pie - it’s still the most powerful, quickest and most persistent method of both personal and mass communication. I’m totally 100% with you on that one.
And I also acknowledge that there are social networks anywhere there is communication - and that it goes beyond sites like Twitter, and networks and blogs. But the point I was making in this article was that the group that considers themselves the so-called “social media elite” really compose such a small fraction of the total picture, that it’s really just laughable.
But personally, I have to say I’m not an email list fan. Too cloggy for me…